
Many times, over the course of my nearly eleven years of priesthood, I have been asked to “give my vocation story.” But this is both the first time I have ever “given my story” to a crowd of fellow converts to the Catholic faith, and also the first time I’ve put my story “finger to keyboard.”
My father’s side of the family is Jewish, emi-grating from eastern Europe a few generations before him. They lived in Perth Amboy, New Jersey, a town that had a significant Jewish population up until the late 20th century. My mother’s side of the family is Roman Catholic, having Slovak and Irish roots (with even a bit of Native American as well). They lived in the New Jersey towns of Port Reading and Carteret, two towns alongside each other, both just a few miles from Perth Amboy. Both sides of the family were, shall we say, non-practicing in their respective faiths. My father’s family was the Jewish equivalent of the “Christmas and Easter Catholics”; Synagogue attendance happened on the high holy days and on the anniversaries of relatives’ deaths. My mother’s side of the family had another familiar story: When my grandfather was dying in the early 1960s, the parish priest would not visit him because of his refusal to do some repair work on the church. My grandmother’s faith was sufficient to forgive the priest and continue going to Mass; her children were not as forgiving, and stopped going to church.
My parents were married in 1965, with the marriage being performed by a Rabbi. I was born in 1967 and named Jonathan Samuel Toborowsky. A truly biblical name, as a cloistered Poor Clare pen pal often reminds me, but in all honesty there were less lofty reasons behind it. “Jonathan” was for John, my mother’s father who had died in 1965, and “Samuel” for my father’s uncle, who had also recently passed away (Jewish cultural tradition said that you do not name children after living relatives). When I was eight days old, a Rabbi brought me into the covenant of Abraham through circumcision. My mother was an operating room nurse at a local hospital, while my father was a police officer who would soon resign from the Department to buy a local bar. As a priest I can honestly say that nothing, no class in the seminary or summer parish assignment, prepared me better for hearing confessions than my years listening to people bare their souls to me as a bartender at the Flat Iron Tavern.
When I was four years old, I began nursery school at Hillel Academy, a Jewish school in Perth Amboy. Hillel was very much like the Catholic schools I’ve known through my years, with two obvious exceptions: First, our religion classes dealt with the Old Testament; Second, we learned how to speak, write, and read Hebrew. I have a vivid memory of being in the fifth grade, going student by student, each one of us reading a verse in Hebrew and then spontaneously translating it into English (with the help of our teacher if need be). Though the years have dulled my translation ability, I can still read and write the letters, something which came in handy in Scripture classes in the seminary.
The first event I can point to which, I would now say, led to becoming a Catholic (and eventually a priest) happened when I was five years old and my parents divorced. I don’t remember much about it. Following the divorce, my mother and I went to live with my grandmother. I think myself fortunate, when compared to other divorce stories I’ve heard thought the years, that I always had regular contact with my father throughout my life. Yes, my parents lived apart, but I never doubted that they both loved me very much.
Here’s where I came under the influence of my Catholic grandmother. With my mother working an early shift at the hospital, it was my Catholic grandmother who woke me up each morning, made me breakfast, and drove her Jewish grandson to a Jewish school, all before going to work herself at the information desk of the same hospital where my mother worked. When my grandmother went to Mass during the week or on Sundays (and my mother needed a rest), she’d bring me along. This was my first experience of Mass, and as a Jewish boy of seven or eight years old, I tried my best to make sense of it all by substituting the Jesus and Mary I heard of at Mass with the Abraham and Sarah I heard of in school. At home, my grandmother’s Catholic faith also was apparent. My most familiar image of her, the one I first think of when I think of her, is the image of her sitting in a chair in her bedroom (the bedroom adorned with statues, holy pictures, and palms from years past) with a rosary in her hands and worn out prayer books handily nearby on the top of her radiator. Though I can’t vouch for what she asked God for in her prayers, I can honestly say that never once in my life did she ever try in any way to get me to become a Catholic, even as a small child when she would have had an easy go of it. I wonder if, in those years when she carted her Jewish grandson to Mass, she could have ever imagined that one day she would attend his first Mass as a priest?
I grew up a pretty normal child, a little geeky and introverted, but normal nonetheless. When Hillel Academy closed after fifth grade, my education shifted to my local public elementary school, junior high, and then high school (I love telling people that my first time as a Catholic school student was as a seminarian!). When I was nine, I joined the Cub Scouts. This began, through my years of involvement in Scouting, the routine of spending one night each week in the basement of a Catholic Church (who sponsored the Cub Scout Pack and Boy Scout Troop) until I was about twenty-five. My years in scouting also meant that I met local kids, Catholic kids who lived much closer to me than the kids I went to school with in Hillel Academy. As kids, our friendship spread beyond scouts into everyday life, and many was the times I attended Mass with them (by now I was used to it) or even waited in the sacristy while they served a wedding or funeral Mass, so that we could play immediately afterwards. At about the same time my Catholic friends were receiving the Sacrament of Confirmation, I began lessons with a Rabbi to make my Bar Mitzvah. Again, my father and his side of the family were not especially observant Jews; this was simply something I was expected to do.
By 1988, following a few years of post-high school wandering, I began work in local government, working in the Mayor’s Office of the Township of Woodbridge. I was the Confidential Aide to the Mayor, meaning I kept him on schedule, escorted guests in and out of the office and around Town Hall, wrote speeches, handled complaints, got him where he needed to be, told him what he needed to know, etc. The job was basically an extension of the work I had begun doing on a volunteer basis during his campaign for office the previous fall. This was my first full time, “grown up” job, and it meant that I had all the trappings of fulltime work: an office, and medical, dental, and prescription plans (all of this whilst many of my high school contemporaries were still in college). What it meant was that, for the first time in my life, I began thinking of the “big picture”: What do I want to do with my life? Who am I? What do I believe?
It was about the time I began asking myself these questions that I started attending daily Mass at the local parish, St. Anthony’s Church. Why did I start going to Mass? Today, as a priest I would say that it was God’s prompting, an action of the Holy Spirit. But back then I thought the reason was familiarity. I had been going to Mass there since I was seven, and thanks to scouting, I’d spent plenty of time in this building (more than I ever did in a synagogue). By June of 1989 I made an appointment with the pastor of St. Anthony, to ask how I could become a Roman Catholic. He explained to me that the parish was about to have the annual carnival, and that we’d meet after the carnival ended. At the end of the carnival, however, he had a heart attack (something I hoped was more about the carnival and not so much about my desire for conversion). A friend offered to take me to the pastor at a neighboring parish, so I went to meet this priest. Surprisingly, this was the same priest who, years earlier, saw me as a young boy hanging around his sacristy, waiting for my friends to finish serving at weddings or funerals. This first meeting began a weekly tradition for me and him; each Monday night from January until my Baptism in September of 1990, I would go to his rectory office and we’d talk about the Catholic faith for an hour. At the time, the priesthood was not on my mind. In my own discernment, I believed that God wanted me to become a Catholic layman, presumably someday with a wife, a family, and a career in government.
Back at St. Anthony’s, another pastor had taken over for the priest who had the heart attack, and here’s where the road took another significant turn in my life. The new priest was closer to my age, energetic, and obviously enthusiastic in his vocation. After regularly seeing me at daily Mass, he asked if I’d be a Lector one day each week. A few months later, I was asked to help distribute Holy Communion. A while after that, I was helping with the youth group (which he had recently begun), and other assorted things around the parish. This is when I began to ask a totally different question: “Where is this all leading, Lord?” I began to think the preposterous question of whether God could be calling me to be a Catholic priest. Not knowing many priests, I went to speak with the priest who brought me into the Church. I wondered whether this was a legitimate calling, or whether I was feeling some zeal that all new converts experience. He told me he thought it was for real; that I was mature enough to know it, if this vocational call was just fueled on emotions. With that in mind, I knew that if I was going to have this question answered in my mind, it would have to be dealt with in more concrete terms. This led to a conversation with the pastor of St. Anthony’s, as well as a conversation with the Bishop of my diocese, which led to the diocese’s vocations office. The rest, shall we say, is history.
I remember watching father Toborowsky on The Journey Home with Marcus Grodi. All I can say is: thank you lord for them both.
Your conversion story is unique because of your Jewish background. Thank you for sharing this inspirational story of your conversion! I too, have a conversion story that resulted in five years of study in the seminary. I left my vocation studies because I realized that I was gay and did not want this to be a problem for the Church. I am, of course, still gay but also still devoted to my Catholic faith. I think it is unfortunate that the Church has had problems with homosexual behavior but I feel that more theological development is needed. Christ never had one word to say on the subject. St. Paul seems to have been anti-sexual altogether. The old testament references are either unclear or ambiguous. Present theology is somewhat confused because the Church has called celibacy a special vocation yet imposes it on priests and homosexuals as a type of punishment! While claiming to support human rights and asking that gays not be discriminated against, the Church actually assures this discrimination will continue because of an incomplete teaching or because what the Church teaches is so clearly discriminatory and anti-gay! what are your thoughts on this?
Drew, everybody unmarried is called to celibacy. I am a straight woman who longs to be married so I have to stay celibate. You’re not the only one. The only people who are allowed to have sex are men and women married to one another, everyone else, gays, straights, priests, nuns, religious, widows and widowers have to stay celibate. You’re one of a long list sunshine, nothing special in that regard. Contact the Courage Apostolate if you are for real.
father,,saw you with fa,trigulio…looking forcanonizatuion for pope pius 12…any help..please respond..phil webb
This is amazing! My mother converted to Orthodox Judaism in 1944, and then met and married my born Jewish father. Although I grew up as an Orthodox Jew, I spent a lot of time with my Italian grandmother, which exposed me to Traditional Catholicism. Because I never found Judaism fulfilling, I ended up converting to Traditional Catholicism when I was 18, in 1978. When I found the Traditional Catholic Faith, the Traditional Latin Mass, and the rest of authentic Catholicism, I finally felt I had come home! But just as Father Toborowsky had, my first exposure to the Faith was through a Catholic grandmother! 🙂
Everyone is called to carry their own crosses. When a man becomes a priest, he must be celibate. This applies whether he is homosexual or heterosexual. When people are single, they are called to the chaste life. This is whether they are homosexual or heterosexual. Why do you seem to think homosexuals deserve some special right to not be celibate even if their state in life requires it?
Such a shame!
Such a shame! You remind me of Rosalind Moss, o sorry I should say “Mother Miriam”, and her brother head of the Association of Hebrew Catholics David! Biblically and historically speaking I can easily make a strong case against the VCC (I use V to encompass all the 39 rites of the church), chiefly would be Acts 21, where Jacob, who was the half brother of Yeshua (Father Yosef, mother Miriam, who of course was a virgin until after she gave birth to Messiah Yeshua) lead a congregation of devout Messianic Jews, out of anti-semitic reasonings the church in the 300’s forbade us to live as Jews. Messianic Judaism is what Jews need, as it’s faithful to Scripture, and true to G-d, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. As a Jew from a Chassidic background, I urge you to find a Messianic Synagogue, and return to the faith of our fathers, and the Messiah they waited for! I’m praying for you.
I have found the True Faith, no need to go off to heretical offshoots! 🙂
Annette, let’s not be tempting people to make angry replies. A Catholic Christian should be exemplary in charity toward his neighbor.
According to traditional Catholic teaching, a protestant is a heretic. Don’t shoot the messenger because you don’t like the message.
Annette, charity is what characterizes the true Christian. You seem unaware that the Catechism of the Catholic Church backs up my point in the following paragraph, quoted from the Vatican II document Unitatis Redintegratio (3 §1), with regard to Christians separated from the Catholic Church, including Protestants:
“818 However, one cannot charge with the sin of separation those who at present are born into these communities (that resulted from such separation) and in them are brought up in the faith of Christ, and the Catholic Church accepts them with respect and affection as brothers…. All who have been justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians, and with good reason are accepted as brothers in the Lord by the children of the Catholic Church.”
If you continue to insist on calling a Protestant a “heretic,” you are not only going against charity, you are negating what the Catechism states and provoking a justifiably angry response on this Catholic blog. Pope Francis, following in the steps of his predecessors, is strongly urging Catholics to love their neighbors, including those who are not of this fold. No one can see anything of that love in the label “heretic.”
One final point: the person you are calling a “heretic” is not Protestant, but Jewish.
For some reason, you seem to have no problem with his trying to lead me away from the True Church into a protestant sect (“Messianic Judaism”, which is actually protestants of Jewish background). How do I know? Because I once was one before I became a Catholic. The “messianic Jewish” movement is a new name for what used to be called “Hebrew Christians”; they modified the name to remove “Christian” so they could convert Jews to it easier. Its a front for a protestant movement missionizing Jews, nothing more. When I was briefly in the movement before finding the True Church and Faith, I noticed that few of them were actually Jewish….most were Gentiles, or people with only one Jewish parent, usually the mother (which means by Jewish law they are not Jewish.) Do not be deceived. They are heavily funded by various protestant denominations, usually the Presbyterians, Baptists and even Anglicans!
Annette, you are Catholic now, and you should act like one, especially on this blog, which is open to non-Catholics. This is now your third warning.
I’m confused. How am I not acting like a Traditional Catholic?
Annette, I don’t care what “kind” of Catholic you are. So long as you claim to be “Catholic,” you should adhere to Catholic moral doctrine. I gave you the information you are now asking for two days ago (see below, in reply to your “don’t shoot the messenger” post).
For your sake, I will here provide additional explanation: There is a difference between “then” (16th century) and “now” (21st century) in that the people who left the Church to become Protestant at the beginning of the Reformation were indeed consciously embracing a heresy; they chose it, and were therefore truly heretics. However, the people living now, who were born into Protestantism without ever knowing Catholicism, cannot be called heretics, even if Protestantism continues to involve heretical doctrine, because they are not leaving the Catholic Church to become Protestant. This is what the document from the Second Vatican Council cited in the Catechism paragraph which I quoted is saying: Protestants who were born into Protestantism without having been Catholic cannot be referred to as “heretics,” because that is not what they are.
Do you believe that the Second Vatican Council was a true ecumenical council? Do you accept its documents? If so, why are you not following them in your posts here? And if not, then you are not truly Catholic and should not be referring to yourself as Catholic.
I accept in Vatican II what is consistent with what the Church has always taught. Does that answer your question?
What your answer indicates to me, Annette, is that you prefer to pick and choose what you will believe, smorgasbord style, rather than accept each and every ecumenical council and papal definition in “obedience of faith” (Romans 1:5; 16:26). If true, this would put you outside the Catholic Church by reason of your own personal heresy.
I would recommend that you read and ponder prayerfully an address by Pope Benedict XVI in 2005, found at http://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/speeches/2005/december/documents/hf_ben_xvi_spe_20051222_roman-curia.html , specifically the part concerning the Second Vatican Council and the “hermeneutic of discontinuity.” A total misunderstanding of this council is evident on both ends of the ideological spectrum. Extremist traditionalists are equally as guilty as extremist progressives in adhering to the false hermeneutic of discontinuity, preferring to see the Second Vatican Council as a break from the consistent teaching of the Church down through the ages. The council was nothing of the sort. The following article explains the true position of the council by means of quotes from the council fathers themselves and the popes: http://www.catholicapologetics.info/modernproblems/vatican2/divatican.htm .
I said I accept whatever the documents of Vatican II teaches that are consistent with authentic, traditional Catholic doctrine and dogma. If by saying that, you feel it puts me outside “the Church”, does that mean nothing Vatican II teaches is genuinely Catholic?
By placing a condition on your acceptation, you implied that you would reject anything in the Second Vatican Council that you personally decided did not meet your self-made criteria. This is, in effect, a Protestant position: picking and choosing what you will believe.
What I stated, backed up by the articles I presented, which include authoritative voices of several Popes, is that there is absolutely nothing in the Second Vatican Council that is contrary to previously promulgated doctrine of the Catholic Church. Any claims to the contrary are false. Therefore, if you reject even one provision of the Second Vatican Council, you have disavowed the Church and have become a heretic.
I have not accused you of anything. This is strictly a conditional point. The choice is yours. Where do you stand?
No…what I meant is that I know Catholic orthodoxy when I see it, because a very traditional, orthodox priest taught it to me when I converted to the Faith. Anything NOT orthodox will jump out and I will know to reject it. I compare anything taught to me in light of Church dogma, doctrine, Tradition, and Scripture.
“I accept in Vatican II what is consistent with what the Church has always taught.” Weasel words, evasive answer.
“I accept whatever the documents of Vatican II teaches that are consistent with authentic, traditional Catholic doctrine and dogma.” Weasel words, evasive answer.
“I know Catholic orthodoxy when I see it…. Anything NOT orthodox will jump out and I will know to reject it.” Weasel words, evasive answer.
Annette, this is now the third time you have attempted to evade my question. It shows me that you, a self-professed Catholic, are determined to reserve judgment of an ecumenical council to yourself. This is a heretical stance.
One last time: 1. Do you believe that the Second Vatican Council, in its entirety and without qualification, was a valid ecumenical council? No weasel words, no evasions; I want a Yes or No.
2. Do you accept the doctrine and discipline of the Second Vatican Council, in its entirety and without qualification, as true Catholic doctrine and discipline? Again, no weasel words, no evasions; I want a Yes or No.
Meanwhile, you have effectively diverted the conversation away from your manifest uncharitableness toward another poster, which is a sin before God in any form of Christianity. I quoted to you the text of the Second Vatican Council, as cited in the Catechism, with regard to the use of the word “heretic” and explained what it means. Final time, a simple Yes or No question: Do you recognize your wrongdoing in calling a non-Catholic a “heretic”?
This is your final opportunity to remain on the CHNI Blog in good standing.
I guess heretics, schismatics and apostates should be glad you don;t give them the Inquisitorial interrogation you give me, eh? What do I think about whether Vatican II was valid or not? I cannot give a yes or no answer because the truth is, I DON’T KNOW IF IT IS OR NOT.
By the way, I’m not a “regular” here, I just happened to find this thread while Googling something else.
I’ve been tough on you, Annette, because you claim to be Catholic. The others that you accuse of being “heretics, schismatics and apostates” make no such claim and in fact have never been Catholic, which makes your accusations quite laughable.
My initial admonition to you was that you adhere to common Christian morality by not insulting people. You ignored me and launched into a complaint that I was not respecting you as a “traditional Catholic.” Subsequent investigation showed that you may be a traditionalist, but you are not a faithful Catholic, since you insist on reserving to your own private judgment the councils and teachings of the Catholic Church.
But to return to my original point: You have continued to ignore my admonition to charity, since you are still pointing fingers at others and playing games with the moderator. Therefore, you are now blacklisted.
Annette – you have the rules of Jewish law backwards: the status of children is determined by their mother. If the mother is Jewish, so are her children (irrespective of the father’s religion); and if the mother is not Jewish, even if the father is, the children are not Jewish (according to Jewish law).