CHNI Forums Home

Search
   
Members

Calendar

Help

CHNI Home
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register for Posting Access 
CHNI Forums > Life In Christ: Prayer and Spiritual Doctrine > Prayer > Questions on the Divine Mercy Chaplet


Questions on the Divine Mercy Chaplet
 Moderated by: Marcus, Dave Armstrong  

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
left coast mystic
Member


Joined: Sat May 10th, 2008
Location: La Honda, California USA
Posts: 129
First Name: Marcee
Gender: Female
Faith History: nondenominational charismatic, Presbyterian, long-time lover of the RCC
Status:  Online
 Posted: Thu Jul 17th, 2008 01:31 am

Quote

Reply
I've been praying the Divine Mercy Chaplet each night, lifting up a different person with each "for the sake of His sorrowful passion".  I find it a great way to remember people to God when you don't have any idea of how to pray more specifically for them.

But recently as I pray the Chaplet, I'm getting stuck on the implication of the words. How can I offer Jesus' body and blood, soul and divinity to God?  He gave them to me, not the other way around.  And it sounds like I'm the priest offering the eucharist, which makes no sense to me.  What is meant by these words in this context?

Can anyone speak to my confusion?

Marcee

 



____________________
Godliness with contentment is great gain. (1 Tim. 6:6)
In returning and rest you shall be saved; in quietness and confidence shall be your strength. (Isa. 30:15)

Quote

Reply
David W. Emery
Network Helper
 

Joined: Fri Sep 29th, 2006
Location: Brownsville, Texas USA
Posts: 2037
First Name: David
Gender: Male
Faith History: Catholic
Status:  Online
 Posted: Thu Jul 17th, 2008 02:56 am

Quote

Reply
I find it a great way to remember people to God when you don't have any idea of how to pray more specifically for them.
I agree.

But recently as I pray the Chaplet, I'm getting stuck on the implication of the words. How can I offer Jesus' body and blood, soul and divinity to God? He gave them to me, not the other way around. And it sounds like I'm the priest offering the eucharist, which makes no sense to me. What is meant by these words in this context?
Catholics don’t deny the priesthood of believers, Marcee. The People of God is a priestly people, just as it says of Israel in Exodus 19:6, and of the Church in 1 Peter 2:9.

The Compendium of the Catechism similarly asserts that “the people of God participate in Christ’s priestly office insofar as the baptized are consecrated by the Holy Spirit to offer spiritual sacrifices” (§155; cf. 1 Peter 2:5) and that “the Christian faithful are those who, inasmuch as they have been incorporated in Christ through Baptism, have been constituted as the people of God; for this reason, since they have become sharers in Christ’s priestly, prophetic and royal office in their own manner, they are called to exercise the mission which God has entrusted to the Church” (§177).

Again, it points out (§218) that in the Mass we act in a mysterious manner as priests: “The liturgy is the celebration of the mystery of Christ and in particular his paschal mystery. Through the exercise of the priestly office of Jesus Christ the liturgy manifests in signs and brings about the sanctification of humankind. The public worship which is due to God is offered by the Mystical Body of Christ, that is, by its head and by its members.” This is reiterated in §235: “The Church on earth celebrates the liturgy as a priestly people in which each one acts according to his proper function in the unity of the Holy Spirit. The baptized offer themselves in a spiritual sacrifice; the ordained ministers celebrate according to the Order they received for the service of all the members of the Church; the bishops and priests act in the Person of Christ the Head.”

However, in §336 the distinction is still made between this priesthood and that of the ordained ministerial priest: “Ordained priests in the exercise of their sacred ministry speak and act not on their own authority, nor even by mandate or delegation of the community, but rather in the Person of Christ the Head and in the name of the Church. Therefore, the ministerial priesthood differs essentially and not just in degree from the priesthood common to all the faithful for whose service Christ instituted it.”

David


Quote

Reply
left coast mystic
Member


Joined: Sat May 10th, 2008
Location: La Honda, California USA
Posts: 129
First Name: Marcee
Gender: Female
Faith History: nondenominational charismatic, Presbyterian, long-time lover of the RCC
Status:  Online
 Posted: Fri Jul 18th, 2008 01:14 am

Quote

Reply
David W. Emery wrote: Through the exercise of the priestly office of Jesus Christ the liturgy manifests in signs and brings about the sanctification of humankind.
David, could you unpack this for me?  It's a bit beyond my understanding.  What is meant by "the liturgy manifests in signs"?  I have always thought that I understood the scripture about believers being kings and priests, with the priestly function expressed through our intercession for others - individuals and the church as a whole.  But the added priestly function of confecting the Body & Blood is a new concept to me. Sometimes I think I get it and sometimes it doesn't hold together for me.  That, of course, needn't affect my acceptance of the confection by faith.

So the Chaplet is challenging me specifically because I don't yet "get" this different, or additional, function of ordained priests: the confection and offering of the eucharist.  As you said, the ordained priesthood is different in essence from the general priesthood of believers, yet (to me) the words of the Chaplet make it as though an ordained priest is speaking.  I know how I can offer prayers for the people as a priest, but how can I offer Christ's Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity to God when I'm not an ordained priest? 

Marcee the confused



____________________
Godliness with contentment is great gain. (1 Tim. 6:6)
In returning and rest you shall be saved; in quietness and confidence shall be your strength. (Isa. 30:15)

Quote

Reply
David W. Emery
Network Helper
 

Joined: Fri Sep 29th, 2006
Location: Brownsville, Texas USA
Posts: 2037
First Name: David
Gender: Male
Faith History: Catholic
Status:  Online
 Posted: Fri Jul 18th, 2008 03:36 am

Quote

Reply
To begin with, Marcee, a sacrament (such as baptism or the Eucharist) can be defined as a “sacred and efficacious sign of the conferring of divine grace.” The liturgy (the Church’s public act of worship) enacts this and similar signs (for example, in the Mass, which is the liturgical form of the sacrament of the Eucharist), the result being “the sanctification of mankind.”

The texts I presented previously were taken from the Compendium of the Catechism. It is admittedly very compressed in expression and needs a lot of explanation to make it intelligible to the uninitiated. I used it, however, precisely because of its brevity. Now we have need to amplify (or as you say, unpack) a particular passage. No problem. The following excerpt is from the corresponding passage in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
    1067 “The wonderful works of God among the people of the Old Testament were but a prelude to the work of Christ the Lord in redeeming mankind and giving perfect glory to God. He accomplished this work principally by the Paschal mystery of his blessed Passion, Resurrection from the dead, and glorious Ascension, whereby ‘dying he destroyed our death, rising he restored our life.’ [Memorial Acclamation B from the Order of the Mass, Ordinary Form] For it was from the side of Christ as he slept the sleep of death upon the cross that there came forth ‘the wondrous sacrament of the whole Church’” (Sacrosanctum Concilium [Vatican II, Constitution on the Liturgy] 5 §2; cf. St. Augustine, Ennarrationes in Psalmos 138, 2). For this reason, the Church celebrates in the liturgy above all the Paschal mystery by which Christ accomplished the work of our salvation.

    1068 It is this mystery of Christ that the Church proclaims and celebrates in her liturgy so that the faithful may live from it and bear witness to it in the world:

    For it is in the liturgy, especially in the divine sacrifice of the Eucharist [in its identity with the sacrifice of the cross], that “the work of our redemption is accomplished,” and it is through the liturgy especially that the faithful are enabled to express in their lives and manifest to others the mystery of Christ and the real nature of the true Church (Sacrosanctum Concilium 2).

    1070 In the New Testament the word “liturgy” refers not only to the celebration of divine worship but also to the proclamation of the Gospel and to active charity (cf. Lk 1:23; Acts 13:2; Rom 15:16, 27; 2 Cor 9:12; Phil 2:14-17, 25, 30). In all of these situations it is a question of the service of God and neighbor. In a liturgical celebration the Church is servant in the image of her Lord, the one “leitourgos” (cf. Heb 8:2, 6); she shares in Christ’s priesthood (worship), which is both prophetic (proclamation) and kingly (service of charity):

    The liturgy then is rightly seen as an exercise of the priestly office of Jesus Christ. It involves the presentation of man’s sanctification under the guise of signs perceptible by the senses and its accomplishment in ways appropriate to each of these signs. In it full public worship is performed by the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ, that is, by the Head and his members. From this it follows that every liturgical celebration, because it is an action of Christ the priest and of his Body which is the Church, is a sacred action surpassing all others. No other action of the Church can equal its efficacy by the same title and to the same degree. (Sacrosanctum Concilium 7 §2–3)
I have always thought that I understood the scripture about believers being kings and priests, with the priestly function expressed through our intercession for others — individuals and the church as a whole. But the added priestly function of confecting the Body & Blood is a new concept to me.
Quite understandable, since Protestants do not have a ministerial priesthood, seeing Christ himself as the one priest of the New Covenant; and they are right, as far as they go.

But let us return to the Israelites of Moses’ time, when they were in the desert. Here we see over and over again that the people are referred to as constituting a priesthood. And yet there were also the Aaronic priests and Levites. People brought their offerings of grain or animals to the tabernacle, and the priests did the actual rendering to the Lord within the tabernacle on their behalf. So the people offered their sacrifices to the Lord in and through the priest.

Now it is physically impossible for Jesus Christ to die over and over again throughout history and in every place in order to bring his sacrifice to the Father on behalf of all the world’s inhabitants into the lives of each person. This is why he established the Eucharist, which brings this very sacrifice into the present and into the lives of all present, uniting us with himself both individually and corporately. (I am reminded here of the traditional spiritual that asks, “Were you there when they crucified my Lord?” And the question remains: Were you really there? Through the Mass you were.) It is an unbloody sign not limited by space and time. (Christ’s bloody death on the cross, even in Protestant theology, was a sign, a sacrament of the grace that is conferred through it.) And the priests of today serve in persona Christi — in the person of Christ — to confect and offer the Eucharist on behalf of the people, just as he did at the Last Supper. Meanwhile, the people, in and through the priest, themselves offer the Eucharist to the Lord just as the Israelites of old offered and partook of the paschal lamb.

In the Chaplet of Divine Mercy, it is presumed that the Eucharist exists as already confected, not as in the process of being confected. (As indeed it does exist in tabernacles all over the world.) In other words, it does not replace the liturgy of the Mass, but rather makes use of what is already present through the ministration of ministerial priest in the sacrifice of the Mass. It is indeed this very connection with the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist that makes the Chaplet so fitting for time spent in the presence of the tabernacle of the Lord, though this is not the usual way it is prayed today. If you go back to the Diary of St. Faustina, however, you will see that this is the way she generally prayed it.

I know how I can offer prayers for the people as a priest, but how can I offer Christ's Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity to God when I'm not an ordained priest?
You appear to be still boggling over the fact that Catholicism recognizes both the priesthood of the believer and the ordained ministerial priesthood. You know that ours is a religion of both/and, not so much of either/or, so you might have expected things to be this way. The ordained priest is necessary to preside in the sacred sign which is the Mass and the sacrament, but the faithful in the pews, as priests in their own right (though of a different order, as the Catechism states), can offer what he confects, for it is their Eucharist and their sacrifice just as much as it is his.

If it is the Body and Blood of Christ, consuming it makes one a member of the mystical Body of Christ and fully united with its head. The consuming is a partaking of the sacrifice; this is a priestly function, is it not? The fact that one is a member of Christ’s body means that, in a mystical way, he has become one with him. If Christ is the high priest, what does this unity mean? Salvation and unity with the whole Christ, both spiritually and materially.

Still confused? Pray about it, let it sink in for a few days. Then come back with your questions and we’ll talk again. OK?

David


Quote

Reply
japhy
Member


Joined: Thu Apr 26th, 2007
Location: Princeton, New Jersey USA
Posts: 185
First Name: Jeff (you can call me "japhy"
Gender: Male
Faith History: Catholic (Latin Rite)
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 18th, 2008 08:46 am

Quote

Reply
Well, it just so happens that Vatican II teaches that all the faithful, who have the baptismal priesthood, can offer Jesus to the Father and unite themselves to Jesus, the perfect sacrifice; furthermore, pastors need to teach their flock this great mystery.

"
The Church, therefore, earnestly desires that Christ's faithful, when present at this mystery of faith, should not be there as strangers or silent spectators; on the contrary, through a good understanding of the rites and prayers they should take part in the sacred action conscious of what they are doing, with devotion and full collaboration. They should be instructed by God's word and be nourished at the table of the Lord's body; they should give thanks to God; by offering the Immaculate Victim, not only through the hands of the priest, but also with him, they should learn also to offer themselves..." (Sacrosanctum Concilium, n. 48)

"Thus the Eucharistic Action, over which the priest presides, is the very heart of the congregation. So priests must instruct their people to offer to God the Father the Divine Victim in the Sacrifice of the Mass, and to join to it the offering of their own lives." (Presbyterorum Ordinis, n. 5)

The mystery was articulated at length by Pope Pius XII in his masterpiece encyclical on the liturgy, Mediator Dei.  If you ever have the time, I strongly suggest reading it!  Let me give you a lengthy excerpt (from nn. 84-93) which I believe will help to bear fruit in your prayers, particularly those of the Divine Mercy Chaplet, but most especially those which you offer at Mass.

Oh, but first, a bit of terminology will help here.  A sacrifice has two parts:  the death of the victim and the offering of the victim.  The death is often called immolation (from the Latin immolare which means "to sacrifice"), and this is achieved in the Mass with the words of Consecration ("This is my Body", "This is my Blood").  The offering of the victim is often called oblation (from the Latin oblata, a form of offerre, which means "to offer").  The priest, and he alone by virtue of his ordination, is the minister of the immolation; but as Mediator Dei explains, all of the faithful share in the oblation.

Now onto the quote:
(84) [W]e deem it necessary to recall that the priest acts for the people only because he represents Jesus Christ, who is Head of all His members and offers Himself in their stead. ...

(85) However, it must also be said that the faithful do offer the divine Victim, though in a different sense. ...

(86) "Not only," says Innocent III of immortal memory, "do the priests offer the sacrifice, but also all the faithful: for what the priest does personally by virtue of his ministry, the faithful do collectively by virtue of their intention." We are happy to recall one of St. Robert Bellarmine's many statements on this subject. "The sacrifice," he says "is principally offered in the person of Christ. Thus the oblation that follows the consecration is a sort of attestation that the whole Church consents in the oblation made by Christ, and offers it along with Him."

(87) Moreover, the rites and prayers of the eucharistic sacrifice signify and show no less clearly that the oblation of the Victim is made by the priests in company with the people. For not only does the sacred minister, after the oblation of the bread and wine when he turns to the people, say the significant prayer: "Pray brethren, that my sacrifice and yours may be acceptable to God the Father Almighty;" but also the prayers by which the divine Victim is offered to God are generally expressed in the plural number: and in these it is indicated more than once that the people also participate in this august sacrifice inasmuch as they offer the same. ...

(88) Nor is it to be wondered at, that the faithful should be raised to this dignity. ... [T]hey participate, according to their condition, in the priesthood of Christ.

(89) It is fitting, then, that the Christian people should also desire to know in what sense they are said in the canon of the Mass to offer up the sacrifice. ...

(90) First of all the more extrinsic explanations are these: it frequently happens that the faithful assisting at Mass join their prayers alternately with those of the priest, and sometimes - a more frequent occurrence in ancient times - they offer to the ministers at the altar bread and wine to be changed into the body and blood of Christ, and, finally, by their alms they get the priest to offer the divine victim for their intentions.

(91) But there is also a more profound reason why all Christians, especially those who are present at Mass, are said to offer the sacrifice.

(92) In this most important subject it is necessary, in order to avoid giving rise to a dangerous error, that we define the exact meaning of the word "offer." The unbloody immolation at the words of consecration, when Christ is made present upon the altar in the state of a victim, is performed by the priest and by him alone, as the representative of Christ and not as the representative of the faithful. But it is because the priest places the divine victim upon the altar that he offers it to God the Father as an oblation for the glory of the Blessed Trinity and for the good of the whole Church. Now the faithful participate in the oblation, understood in this limited sense, after their own fashion and in a twofold manner, namely, because they not only offer the sacrifice by the hands of the priest, but also, to a certain extent, in union with him. It is by reason of this participation that the offering made by the people is also included in liturgical worship.

(93) Now it is clear that the faithful offer the sacrifice by the hands of the priest from the fact that the minister at the altar, in offering a sacrifice in the name of all His members, represents Christ, the Head of the Mystical Body. Hence the whole Church can rightly be said to offer up the victim through Christ. But the conclusion that the people offer the sacrifice with the priest himself is not based on the fact that, being members of the Church no less than the priest himself, they perform a visible liturgical rite; for this is the privilege only of the minister who has been divinely appointed to this office: rather it is based on the fact that the people unite their hearts in praise, impetration, expiation and thanksgiving with prayers or intention of the priest, even of the High Priest himself, so that in the one and same offering of the victim and according to a visible sacerdotal rite, they may be presented to God the Father. It is obviously necessary that the external sacrificial rite should, of its very nature, signify the internal worship of the heart. Now the sacrifice of the New Law signifies that supreme worship by which the principal Offerer himself, who is Christ, and, in union with Him and through Him, all the members of the Mystical Body pay God the honor and reverence that are due to Him.



____________________
[Mary said,] "Do whatever he tells you." - John 2:5

Quote

Reply
Howard the Pilgrim
Member
 

Joined: Sun Dec 16th, 2007
Location: Lamar, Colorado USA
Posts: 59
First Name: Howard
Gender: Male
Faith History: United Presbyterian, non-denom, American Baptist, non-denom, Conservative Baptist, United Methodist ...
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Jul 20th, 2008 06:43 am

Quote

Reply
Hi Marcee

I'm glad you have other more detailed explanations.  I love the Chaplet of Divine Mercy and I have the VHS tape of it in song.  My wife watched it and was at first offended by what seemed to be the presumption of us offering "the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Your Dearly Beloved Son, Our Lord, Jesus Christ, in atonement for our sins and those of the whole world."  But then after she thought about it for awhile she decided it made sense.  That is all that we have to offer God in atonement for our sins and those of the world as we ask for His Divine Mercy on us and the whole world.  I hope her thought process is helpful to you.

For the sake of His sorrowful passion have mercy on us and on the whole world.  Jesus, I trust in you.

Lord Jesus, I believe, help my unbelief.

May God bless and enfold you into His heart of love.

Howard the Pilgrim


Quote

Reply
left coast mystic
Member


Joined: Sat May 10th, 2008
Location: La Honda, California USA
Posts: 129
First Name: Marcee
Gender: Female
Faith History: nondenominational charismatic, Presbyterian, long-time lover of the RCC
Status:  Online
 Posted: Sun Jul 20th, 2008 04:14 pm

Quote

Reply
I've been delaying posting a response to David and Japhy's most excellent explanations, thinking that perhaps I would have absorbed the essence of it in a day or two.  But what's been written is SO rich that I'm realizing that it's going to take me quite awhile before I fully comprehend it on a deep level.

Meanwhile, the original question of how we can offer Christ's Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity in atonement HAS settled itself.  I'm thinking this may be another example of words getting in the way of concepts.  As a protestant I have never had trouble with understanding that it's Jesus' sacrifice that allows us into God's presence - we're "covered by His blood" - and because of we are enabled (and expected) to be co-priests with Jesus on behalf of people everywhere.  That seems to me to be the same concept in slightly different words. 

Marcee



____________________
Godliness with contentment is great gain. (1 Tim. 6:6)
In returning and rest you shall be saved; in quietness and confidence shall be your strength. (Isa. 30:15)

Quote

Reply

 Current time is 05:10 am
CHNI Forums > Life In Christ: Prayer and Spiritual Doctrine > Prayer > Questions on the Divine Mercy Chaplet




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez