CHNI Forums Home

Search
   
Members

Calendar

Help

CHNI Home
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register for Posting Access 
CHNI Forums > Questions Not Covered Elsewhere > What Else Do You Need to Know? > Am I right to be amazed at the stability of Rome over the centuries??


Am I right to be amazed at the stability of Rome over the centuries??
 Moderated by: Marcus, Dave Armstrong  

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
JillD
Member


Joined: Fri Sep 29th, 2006
Location: Visalia, California USA
Posts: 857
First Name: Jill
Gender: Female
Faith History: heathen, EvFree, Messianic, LC-MS, Catholic 2007
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 04:59 am

Quote

Reply
Again, having conversations with my brother who has much more of a focus on Israel, he can't figure why Rome is so important.  Why not Israel/Jerusalem?

It occurs to me, I think, that since the first century, there is no other city/country which has been as stable as Rome in terms of its suitability as the seat of the authority of the Church.

Jerusalem was long in the hands of Muslims.  Though now, wasn't Rome in the hands of barbarians for a time?  Northern Europe was populated by barbarians, right?  Constantinople, northern Africa, and the Middle East are all now Muslim.  Where else could, theoretically, Peter have been 'stationed'?  Maybe Athens??

Looking back over 19+ centuries, is it correct to see God's hand keeping Rome uniquely safe for His Church?

Jill



____________________
"I praise you, for I am wondrously made. Wonderful are our works! My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret." Ps 139
"Guard me, O Lord, from the hands of the wicked; preserve me from violent men." Ps 140

Quote

Reply
CajunRick
Network Helper


Joined: Fri Sep 29th, 2006
Location: Houma, Louisiana USA
Posts: 5457
First Name: Rick (& Kermie)
Gender: Male
Faith History: Lifetime Catholic, Latin Rite
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 22nd, 2008 05:11 am

Quote

Reply
For a long time, Rome was stable because it was the seat of the Church.  At the collapse of western civilization, the pope became a temporal power rivaling the kings of France, England, and Spain, and the Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire headquartered in Germany.  Italy did not exist; it was known as the Papal States and was ruled from the Vatican.  Today only the Vatican itself remains of the Papal States, which gives the pope the status of a head of state.  That's why the pope can meet with presidents and kings as an equal, and has a standing invitation (as do all heads of state) to speak to the United Nations.

The United States has diplomatic relations with the Vatican, and permanent observer status at the U.N.

There were a few occasions when the pope fled Rome, and a time when the papacy was relocated to Avignon, France, but otherwise the pope has always remained headquartered in Rome.



____________________
Understanding is the reward of faith. Therefore seek not to understand that you may believe, but believe that you may understand. - Augustine

Rick Luquette
Luquette Lane

Quote

Reply
Steven Barrett
Member


Joined: Tue Nov 14th, 2006
Location: Hadley, Massachusetts USA
Posts: 1185
First Name: Steven
Gender: Male
Faith History: Catholic, Episcopal communicant, Baptist, Catholic
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 01:59 am

Quote

Reply
No matter how strongly Protestants might protest to the contrary, there had to be some reason why God saw fit that Rome would be the focus of His Church. It's a mystery of faith to most non-Catholics. For us, however, it makes perfect sense, especially for many of the same reasons Cajunrick explained above.

I try not to pick apart God's reasons, especially when the logic of history and  plain spiritual common sense speaks so loudly for Rome's ascendant position. Funny how Rome, despite all her sackings, occupations and near decline into a small village, nevertheless managed to hold on to her place whilst Constantinople fell (nobly in brave combat) and the Protestants stole Canterbury.

:waving:



____________________
"This Old House's" motto is "Measure twice, cut once." My new motto is THINK at least twice or thrice, then you only have to write once, and maybe apologize nonce.

Quote

Reply
tedjenczewski
Member
 

Joined: Thu May 10th, 2007
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 306
First Name: Ted
Gender: Male
Faith History: Catholic, Presbyterian, revert Catholic
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 02:52 am

Quote

Reply
Rome was  recognized as the "first" among the apostolic churches because it was founded by St. Peter (and St. Paul). Peter first founded the church at Antioch, and later went on to Rome and founded the church there  from which he was martyred. The church and bishop at Rome have always been recognized as the seat authority of the Catholic Church. This is clearly seen in Clement's letter to the Corinthians (95 AD), St Ignatius Letter to the Romans (110AD) and St. Ireneous book "Agains Heresies" (190 AD) section 210. These documents can be found at http://www.newadvent.org

 



____________________
"...the church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth." 1Tim 3, 15

Quote

Reply
BeProf
Member
 

Joined: Thu Jan 3rd, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 87
First Name: Ed
Gender: Male
Faith History: Independent Fundamental Baptist - Atheism - Christian & Missionary Alliance
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Apr 23rd, 2008 05:27 pm

Quote

Reply
Civil Rome was anything but stable. Indeed, much of the authority (temporal authority at least) of the Pope developed because of the insecurity of Rome.

After Constantine moved the capital, things got pretty bad in Rome. Wave after wave of barbarians sacked the city and the the distant Emperor did pretty much nothing to prevent it. There was a great deal of suffering and everybody, naturally, looked to their Pastor to do something about it, and do something about it they did.

Leo the Great, especially, was instrumental in the development of the Papacy as a temporal power. Leo was probably the first Pope that would be recognizable to us as Pope (with most of the titles and rights we associate with that office).


Quote

Reply

 Current time is 11:39 pm
CHNI Forums > Questions Not Covered Elsewhere > What Else Do You Need to Know? > Am I right to be amazed at the stability of Rome over the centuries??




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez