CHNI Forums Home

Search
   
Members

Calendar

Help

CHNI Home
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register for Posting Access 


Eccumenical Patriarch?
 Moderated by: Marcus, Dave Armstrong  

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
Kayla
Member


Joined: Mon Jul 30th, 2007
Location: Emmitsburg, Maryland USA
Posts: 369
First Name: Kayla
Gender: Female
Faith History: Atheist, kind-of Mormon, Catholic
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Aug 23rd, 2007 10:40 pm

Quote

Reply
I heard tell, in conversation, that the Eccumenical Patriarch was originally higher in authority than the Pope before the Great Schism.  Now, I have never heard of such a thing, nor am I really educated much in Church History.  I know the basics on the Great Schism, but...  what about this idea of the Eccumenical Patriarch? 



____________________
I believe, Lord, help my unbelief.
Jesus, I trust in You!

There's not a lot of job security for us after death. I suppose that's one advantage of being a philosopher. - Peter Kreeft

http://kayla23mount.blogspot.com/

Quote

Reply
CajunRick
Network Helper


Joined: Fri Sep 29th, 2006
Location: Houma, Louisiana USA
Posts: 5345
First Name: Rick (& Kermie)
Gender: Male
Faith History: Lifetime Catholic, Latin Rite
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Aug 24th, 2007 12:04 am

Quote

Reply
Kayla wrote: I heard tell, in conversation, that the Eccumenical Patriarch was originally higher in authority than the Pope before the Great Schism.  Now, I have never heard of such a thing, nor am I really educated much in Church History.  I know the basics on the Great Schism, but...  what about this idea of the Eccumenical Patriarch?
The Bishop of Rome has always been considered primary in the Catholic Church.  The movement to elevate the Bishop of Byzantium to the primary role began when Constantine moved the capital of the Roman Empire to that city (which was renamed Constantinople in his honor).  This was actually one of the first rifts which eventually resulted in the Great Schism of 1054.

Today the Bishop of Byzantium (now known as Istanbul) is the leader of the Greek Orthodox Church and is known as the Ecumenical Patriarch because he is considered the first among equals among the patriarchs of the Orthodox Churches.  His position is a primacy of honor, meaning that he has no authority at all over the other Churches.  I believe the Orthodox essentially recognize the See of Peter as equal in stature to the See of Byzantium and perhaps slightly higher in rank, but againk it is considered a primacy of honor and not of authority.  In the Orthodox Churches, the patriarch of a particular Church has complete immediate jurisdiction.

This can cause problems, such as the current case in Jerusalem.  The patriarch of Jerusalem was judged by the other patriarchs to have fallen into heresy.  He was deposed and replaced, but for a long time the government of Israel supported the first patriarch.  Only recently has the Israeli government agreed to accept the new patriarch, but the old patriarch still claims the tltle and still functions as a "patriarch in exile" so there has been what amounts to a schism in the Church at Jerusalem.  It will eventually be settled, but it demonstrates the importance of a central authority in the Church.



____________________
Understanding is the reward of faith. Therefore seek not to understand that you may believe, but believe that you may understand. - Augustine

Rick Luquette
Luquette Lane

Quote

Reply

 Current time is 08:22 pm




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez