CHNI Forums Home

Search
   
Members

Calendar

Help

CHNI Home
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register for Posting Access 
CHNI Forums > Questions about Catholicism > The Church > Which is older, if either, Catholic or Orthodox?


Which is older, if either, Catholic or Orthodox?
 Moderated by: Marcus, Dave Armstrong  

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
JillD
Member


Joined: Fri Sep 29th, 2006
Location: Visalia, California USA
Posts: 857
First Name: Jill
Gender: Female
Faith History: heathen, EvFree, Messianic, LC-MS, Catholic 2007
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Nov 3rd, 2006 06:31 pm

Quote

Reply
I'm having a conversation with a very well-read friend who, in the course of our discussion, said this:

The Orthodox say they are "the Church", once delivered to the saints. Timewise, from the beginning, they certainly have the best cards in their hand.

Why would she make this statement?  I thought they were both there in the beginning and that, at one point, the Eastern churches chose to no longer remain under the authority of the Pope.  I hope you can help me clear this one up....

I have another comment of hers that I'm going to ask on the Justification thread.  (There is one, isn't there??)



____________________
"I praise you, for I am wondrously made. Wonderful are our works! My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret." Ps 139
"Guard me, O Lord, from the hands of the wicked; preserve me from violent men." Ps 140

Quote

Reply
CajunRick
Network Helper


Joined: Fri Sep 29th, 2006
Location: Houma, Louisiana USA
Posts: 5457
First Name: Rick (& Kermie)
Gender: Male
Faith History: Lifetime Catholic, Latin Rite
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Nov 3rd, 2006 07:00 pm

Quote

Reply
I don't think the Catholics or Orthodox are any older.  We were once joined in a single Church and for various economic and political reasons the two separated.

A full study of the history of the relationship between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches is necessary to understand the reasons for the separation, but there was a functional separation for many years before the "formal" separation in 1054, which resulted in the mutual excommunications of the pope and the ecumenical patriarch by each other.



____________________
Understanding is the reward of faith. Therefore seek not to understand that you may believe, but believe that you may understand. - Augustine

Rick Luquette
Luquette Lane

Quote

Reply
SBC2RCC
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 9th, 2006
Location: York, South Carolina USA
Posts: 132
First Name: Monte
Gender: Male
Faith History: was Southern Baptist Minister, now Roman Catholic
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Nov 7th, 2006 09:41 pm

Quote

Reply
As I made my journey into a connection to the historic faith of the Apostles, I seriously considered Orthodoxy. BUT, one thing that struck me was the separateness, the emphasis on NOT being in unity with Catholics, especially with the Pope. This struck me as wrong, in light of Jesus prayers for unity. Only at the Catholic Church are they praying for others, and accepting of the faith in Christ that other separated brethren hold. A very different attitude than one finds in a Greek or Russian Orthodox church.

And yes, there was only one true church  in the early days, and it had eastern and western branches which had some variations, but shared the same faith, doctrines, etc.



____________________
In Christ,
Monte W
(Formerly on CHN Forum as "Pilgrim Paul";)

Minima Maxima Sunt

Quote

Reply
Steven Barrett
Member


Joined: Tue Nov 14th, 2006
Location: Hadley, Massachusetts USA
Posts: 1185
First Name: Steven
Gender: Male
Faith History: Catholic, Episcopal communicant, Baptist, Catholic
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Nov 16th, 2006 08:55 am

Quote

Reply
Wow! In all my years of following religious history, I've never come across this kind of question.  My dad used to joke that the Orthodox were the "first protestants" because they broke off first.  The more I got to learn about Islam has made me wonder if Mohammed was the first protestant since he managed to gather most of the basics of the Faith; only to scramble them up and call them a new "revelation" from God, or " Allah."

All kidding aside, both the western La tin Catholic and Eastern Greek Orthodox "lungs" (as John Paul the Great called them) were born at the same time when Jesus handed the keys to St. Peter. 

Since the Good Lord created us in His image, I doubt that He goofed and left out a lung, (or in the case of the Muslims, invented a third "lung".)

Insofar as the Orthodox are concerned, they are to be justly credited for sustaining the Church's eastern/Levantine cultural, etc., contributions to Catholicism.  Perhaps the Orthodox' unique practices, vestments, rituals, etc. are indeed "older" but their beliefs aren't.  They can only be the same age since they were born of the same Deposit of Faith/Tradition.

The Orthodox made a crucial mistake by maintaining their cozy church/state marriage longer than necessary.  If any individual, religious figure, king or other governmental figure and/or body deserves credit for creating the separation of church and state, it was popes of the early middle ages -- long before a retired president from Virginia wrote to a Connecticut baptist church containing that now overused and  badly misunderstood phrase about some wall keeping the government out of church business.

Now, if only the Orthodox had a Tom Jefferson to keep the Romanovs and today's Kremlin out of Russian churches!



____________________
"This Old House's" motto is "Measure twice, cut once." My new motto is THINK at least twice or thrice, then you only have to write once, and maybe apologize nonce.

Quote

Reply

 Current time is 01:02 pm
CHNI Forums > Questions about Catholicism > The Church > Which is older, if either, Catholic or Orthodox?




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez